Looking for the Best ATS/CRM for Permanent Placement

Hello everyone!

I manage a construction recruitment firm, and right now, we’re using TopEchelon, but to be honest, I barely utilize it. Most of our applicant tracking is managed through Excel, which isn’t ideal for the long term.

I’m on the hunt for a solid ATS that specializes in permanent placements. I’d love to hear your recommendations, as I’m feeling a bit lost in the options available.

Here are a few platforms I’ve been considering:

  • Greenhouse: It looks nice but doesn’t appear to have all the features that some other systems do. The pricing also seems elevated for the aesthetics alone—could be mistaken, though!

  • Loxo: I’ve heard good things, but I keep coming across negative reviews regarding their customer support and overall functionality, so I think I’ll pass on this one.

  • RecruiterFlow: This one seems promising! It’s straightforward and user-friendly, though it does come off as a bit basic.

I would appreciate any advice or experiences you have with your preferred ATS.

Thanks in advance!

By RCadmin

One thought on “Best Permanent Placement ATS/CRM??”
  1. It sounds like you’re on the right track in evaluating your options for a robust ATS that can help streamline your construction recruitment process. Each of the platforms you’ve mentioned has its strengths and weaknesses, so here are some insights based on your concerns:

    1. Greenhouse: While it’s true that Greenhouse is known for its user-friendly interface and strong candidate experience, it might not have all the features you’re looking for specific to permanent placements in construction. If you’re focusing on candidate tracking and management without too much complexity, it might be worth a trial to see if it meets your needs despite the cost.

    2. Loxo: Given the concerns you’ve mentioned about customer service and system performance, it might be prudent to steer clear of Loxo for now. Good customer support is essential, especially when transitioning to a new system.

    3. RecruiterFlow: This option seems to align with your need for simplicity and streamlining. While it may feel a bit barebones, it might provide the essential features you need without overwhelming you. One feature to consider is its integration capabilities with other tools you may already be using.

    4. Other Options: Additionally, you might want to explore:

    5. Bullhorn: It’s a popular choice in the staffing industry and offers strong features for permanent placements, including candidate engagement tools.
    6. JobAdder: This ATS offers good integration options and is designed for recruiters, making it a decent fit for construction recruitment as well.
    7. Crelate: Particularly good for recruiting agencies and offers solid reporting features.

    Overall, it might be worth doing trials for a couple of these platforms to see which one resonates best with your team’s workflow. Also, consider reaching out to user communities or forums for firsthand experiences from others in construction recruitment. Good luck!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *