Hey, fellow recruiters from recruitment agencies
Hello, fellow recruitment professionals,
I’m curious about how you collaborate with clients to gather feedback on candidate lists.
Could you share your preferred approach? Here are some common methods:
- Simply exporting CVs and sharing them with the client for review after screening calls.
- Providing client access to your ATS, where they can view and rate candidates directly.
- Inviting the client to participate alongside a panel in submitting unbiased ratings for candidates on a platform, helping to determine who advances to the next stage.
Or do you have a different approach? I’d love to hear about it!
Hi there!
Great question! In my experience, effective collaboration with clients to gather feedback on candidate lists can vary based on the client’s preferences and the nature of the recruitment process. Here’s a breakdown of the common methods and my thoughts:
Exporting CVs for Review After Screening Calls: This is probably the traditional method and works well for clients who prefer a more hands-off approach initially. After we conduct screening calls, we send a curated list of candidates for their review. It allows them to focus on candidates we’ve already vetted, but it can sometimes lead to delays in feedback, as the client may have to go back and forth.
Using an ATS for Client Feedback: Inviting clients into an ATS can streamline the process significantly. Clients can view candidates’ profiles, provide ratings, and leave comments directly on the platform. This transparency can enhance collaboration, as they can see real-time changes and feedback, making it easier to track preferences.
Panel Ratings on a Platform: This approach adds a layer of objectivity and inclusivity, especially if the client has multiple stakeholders involved in the hiring process. This way, each panel member can rate candidates independently, preventing bias and encouraging diverse opinions. It can be very effective for ensuring the selected candidates align with the broader team’s expectations.
Other Ways: We sometimes employ methods like structured feedback sessions, where we gather stakeholders’ input through a guided discussion format. This can be effective for larger teams who might benefit from collaborative input. We also sometimes create a candidate scorecard, where we align on key criteria before presenting candidates, which helps streamline the feedback process.
Ultimately, the choice of method often depends on the client’s size, their internal processes, and how collaborative they want to be. Establishing a clear communication channel from the get-go makes any of these methods more effective!
Looking forward to hearing how others approach this as well!